- John Bolton pleads not guilty to multiple counts under the Espionage Act.
- Trump’s Justice Department intensifies actions against critics accused of mishandling national security data.
- Bolton allegedly shared classified material with relatives while writing a book.
- Each charge carries up to 10 years in prison.
- DOJ sources call the case stronger than previous political prosecutions.
WASHINGTON — The political firestorm over classified information reached a new peak Friday as former National Security Adviser John Bolton pleaded not guilty to federal charges accusing him of sharing sensitive U.S. intelligence with relatives for use in a book project.
The high-profile indictment marks one of the most aggressive moves yet by President Donald Trump’s Justice Department, led by Attorney General Pam Bondi, as it tightens its grip on those accused of breaching national security protocols and mishandling classified data.
Bolton, wearing a dark blue suit and maroon tie, appeared before a federal judge in Greenbelt, Maryland, where he formally entered his plea. “Not guilty, your honor,” he declared, his voice steady but firm.
Federal prosecutors charged the former diplomat with eight counts of transmitting national defense information and ten counts of retaining classified material under the Espionage Act, a law that carries penalties of up to ten years per count. The charges stem from allegations that Bolton shared internal notes on intelligence briefings, foreign leader discussions, and high-level national security meetings with two relatives who assisted him while drafting his memoir.
According to the indictment, the relatives—later identified by individuals familiar with the case as his wife and daughter—were referred to by Bolton as his “editors.” One message cited in court records shows Bolton telling them, “Talking with (book publisher) because they have a right of first refusal!”
His attorney, Abbe Lowell, rejected the allegations outright, stating that his client “did not unlawfully share or store any information.” Lowell added that Bolton has “consistently acted in good faith and in the interest of the United States.”
The case against Bolton comes amid a wave of prosecutions targeting several outspoken critics of President Trump. In recent months, the Justice Department has pursued cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, reflecting what insiders describe as a new phase in Trump’s promise of “accountability” toward officials he believes undermined his presidency.
Administration sources have confirmed that Trump personally urged Bondi to accelerate certain cases, arguing that political bias within prior administrations shielded senior officials from responsibility. “He’s a bad guy,” Trump said Thursday when asked about Bolton’s indictment, underscoring the personal animosity between the two former allies.
Bolton served as Trump’s national security adviser during the president’s first term, before parting ways after a series of sharp policy disagreements. In his 2024 memoir, he described Trump as unfit for office — a statement that further fractured their relationship and made him one of the administration’s most visible internal critics.
While Trump’s critics accuse the Justice Department of pursuing political vendettas, supporters argue that the prosecutions reflect a long-overdue effort to restore discipline and integrity to how classified information is handled. Inside the Department of Justice, officials reportedly view Bolton’s case as far stronger than the earlier prosecutions of Comey and James, according to a person familiar with the matter.
The Bolton indictment, filed in Maryland federal court, paints a picture of deliberate mishandling of intelligence materials for personal gain. Prosecutors allege that Bolton retained sensitive notes and files long after leaving government service, and that portions of these materials were used during his book-writing process.
Legal analysts say the case could set a precedent for how the government enforces secrecy laws against former high-level officials. “If the Justice Department succeeds, it sends a chilling message across Washington — that classified information is no longer a political shield but a legal liability,” said one former prosecutor.
Bolton’s arraignment signals the start of what could become one of the most politically charged national security trials in decades. Each count under the Espionage Act will be weighed separately, and sentencing, if any, would ultimately rest with a federal judge after considering a range of factors including intent, damage assessment, and cooperation.
For now, Bolton remains free pending trial, while the Justice Department pushes forward with its high-profile effort to prosecute what it calls “reckless disclosures” of national defense information. The case stands as a defining moment for Trump’s administration — one that blends legal accountability with unmistakable political undertones.
