The parents of murdered teenager Jimmy Mizen are reeling after it was revealed that their son’s killer, Jake Fahri, allegedly recorded music referencing his death.
Fahri, who was jailed for the 2008 killing of 16-year-old Jimmy, has now been returned to custody after violating his release conditions.
Fahri, now 35, was released on license in June 2023 after serving time for the brutal murder.
In the years since, he is believed to have recorded music under the name “TEN,” a drill rap artist who conceals his identity by wearing a ski mask.
Some of his tracks reportedly include disturbing references to Jimmy’s death, including violent lyrics such as, “See a man’s soul fly from his eyes… Seeing blood spilt same floor he was left on.”
The U.K. Ministry of Justice has launched an investigation into the matter, and Fahri has been returned to custody after his parole conditions were breached.
A spokesperson for the U.K.’s Probation Service condemned the situation, expressing sympathy for Jimmy’s family and affirming that all offenders released on license are subject to strict regulations.

READ ALSO: Son and Girlfriend Found Dead in Home Had Been Living with His Parents’ Slain Bodies for Months
Jimmy’s parents, Barry and Margaret Mizen, have expressed their shock and disgust at Fahri’s alleged actions. Speaking to the BBC, Margaret said, “The words are absolutely horrendous,” while Barry stated that the couple was “stunned into silence” after learning about the music.
The Mizens, who founded the Jimmy Mizen Foundation, which promotes messages of peace and forgiveness, are now calling for more attention to be paid to the harmful effects of glorifying violence.
The Mizens’ concerns were echoed by the public, as the tracks containing violent lyrics have been played on platforms like BBC 1Xtra, Spotify, and YouTube.
However, Spotify has since clarified that none of the tracks featuring these alleged lyrics are available on the platform. The BBC also confirmed that they would no longer play Fahri’s music.
This development has sparked renewed conversation around the ethics of allowing violent content to be publicly distributed and the emotional toll it takes on victims’ families.