- Texas A&M dismissed senior lecturer Melissa McCoul after a viral classroom video on gender identity.
- University president Mark A. Welsh III also removed two administrators for approving the course material.
- Political pressure from Republican lawmakers influenced the decision, despite earlier assurances.
- Texas A&M System to launch a full audit of courses across its campuses.
- Debate intensifies over academic freedom, censorship, and free speech in higher education.
Texas A&M University has dismissed senior lecturer Melissa McCoul, following a firestorm of political controversy over course content related to gender identity. The decision, announced Tuesday evening by university president Mark A. Welsh III, comes after a viral video ignited outrage among Republican lawmakers and spurred calls for investigations at both the state and federal levels.
According to The Texas Tribune, the recording, circulated online Monday, captured audio of a student challenging a professor for teaching that “there are more than two genders.” The student argued this contradicted her religious beliefs and President Donald Trump’s recent executive order. The professor replied that she had the right to teach the lesson and that the student could choose to leave.
By Tuesday, the fallout had escalated. “This isn’t about academic freedom; it’s about academic responsibility,” Welsh said in a statement. “Our degree programs and courses go through extensive approval processes, and we must ensure that what we ultimately deliver to students is consistent with what was approved.”
Welsh added that while adjustments had been made over the summer to align courses with “reasonable expectations,” it became clear that another class was still teaching materials inconsistent with its description. That led to McCoul’s removal.
The controversy extended beyond McCoul. Welsh announced that College of Arts and Sciences Dean Mark Zoran and department head Emily Johansen, who approved the course materials, would also be removed from their leadership positions. It remains unclear if they will remain employed in other roles within the university.
Welsh’s actions marked a significant reversal from comments he made earlier this week when, in one of the viral clips, he told a concerned student that “firing” the professor was “not happening.” His change of course came after mounting political pressure, including from Texas Rep. Brian Harrison (R-Midlothian), who posted the video clips online and demanded investigations.
The firings quickly drew praise from Texas A&M System Chancellor Glenn Hegar, who said the decision underscored that “insubordination and indoctrination have no place on our campus or in our classrooms.” Hegar confirmed that an audit of courses will now extend to all universities in the A&M System.
Governor Greg Abbott also applauded the removal of the dean and department head, calling it “good,” while Republican lawmakers such as Harrison argued the actions did not go far enough, with some demanding Welsh himself be fired.
Meanwhile, Harmeet K. Dhillon, assistant attorney general in the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, described the incident as “deeply concerning” and signaled that the DOJ would review the matter.
The Texas chapter of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) voiced alarm at the developments, warning of erosion in academic freedom. “Academic freedom, which Texas A&M endorses, refers to instructors’ right to teach in their area of expertise free from government interference,” the group said in a Tuesday post on X.
Welsh, who became Texas A&M’s president in 2023, has been under sustained scrutiny from Republican lawmakers over diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies. Earlier this year, Governor Abbott threatened to remove him after the university considered attending a DEI-linked conference, forcing Welsh to reverse course.
The timing of this controversy is especially significant as public universities across Texas prepare for Senate Bill 37, a new law effective January 1 that grants regents greater power over academic programs. Supporters argue it ensures accountability, while critics warn it could be weaponized to eliminate programs deemed unpopular with conservative lawmakers.
With the removal of McCoul and senior leadership shake-ups, Texas A&M finds itself at the intersection of politics, higher education, and the ongoing national debate over academic freedom versus political oversight.
Read Also: Texas Withdraws Lawsuit Against Doctor Accused of Violating Youth Transgender Care Ban
