TownFlexTownFlexTownFlex
  • Home
  • Entertainment
    • Music
      • Lyrics
    • Movies
    • Awards
    • Comedy Skits
  • News
    • Crime News
    • Bizarre
    • Lifestyle
    • Education
    • Scholarship
  • Business
  • Celebrity Net Worth
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Health
Font ResizerAa
TownFlexTownFlex
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • Showbiz
    • Entertainment
    • Music
    • Celebrity Net Worth
    • Awards
    • Movies
    • Lyrics
    • Comedy Skits
  • News
    • General News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Sports
    • Education
    • Scholarship
    • Technology
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
© 2026 Townflex.com. All Rights Reserved.

Home > Politics

Judge Temporarily Blocks Trump’s Plan to Deploy Oregon National Guard to Portland

Last updated: Nov. 28, 2025 4:19 am
Victor Sosu
ByVictor Sosu
Victor Sosu is a dedicated digital storyteller with a sharp eye for detail and a passion for bringing facts to life. He covers entertainment, lifestyle, sports,...
Follow:
Published: Oct. 5, 2025
Share
3 Min Read
trump Portland
Quick summary
  • Federal judge halts Trump’s National Guard deployment to Portland.
  • Ruling says there’s no evidence of rebellion or major law enforcement crisis.
  • Oregon’s attorney general sued, citing 10th Amendment violations.
  • White House plans to appeal, claiming Trump acted lawfully.
  • Portland officials say city remains peaceful despite federal claims.

A federal judge on Saturday temporarily blocked U.S. President Donald Trump from deploying 200 Oregon National Guard troops to Portland, dealing a setback to the White House’s efforts to send military forces into cities run by Democratic officials.

U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut, who was appointed by Trump, issued an injunction preventing the deployment until October 18, saying there was no evidence that recent demonstrations in the city amounted to a rebellion or severely hindered law enforcement.

“The President’s determination was simply untethered to the facts,” Immergut wrote in her ruling. She added that accepting Trump’s interpretation of the law would allow a president to “send military troops virtually anywhere at any time” and risk blurring “the line between civil and military federal power — to the detriment of this nation.”

The decision came after Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield sued the administration on September 28, seeking to block Trump’s move to send troops to “protect federal immigration facilities from domestic terrorists.” The state argued the deployment violated the 10th Amendment and several federal laws governing the use of state National Guard units.

Oregon’s lawsuit claimed that Trump exaggerated the scale of protests in Portland, citing Fox News footage from 2020 that showed far larger demonstrations. In recent months, state attorneys said, Portland protests were “small and sedate,” resulting in only 25 arrests in June and none since mid-June.

The White House said it would appeal the ruling.
“President Trump exercised his lawful authority to protect federal assets and personnel in Portland following violent riots and attacks on law enforcement — we expect to be vindicated by a higher court,” said spokeswoman Abigail Jackson.

Portland Mayor Keith Wilson dismissed the president’s characterization of the city as “war ravaged,” telling reporters that the narrative “was manufactured.”

The ruling marks the latest legal challenge to Trump’s attempts to send military forces into Democratic-led cities, including Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. Earlier this month, a federal court in California blocked a similar deployment, though that decision is under appeal.

On Saturday, Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, a Democrat, said Trump was also preparing to send 300 National Guard troops to Chicago, despite his objections.

Immergut concluded that Oregon was likely to succeed in its argument that Trump’s order unlawfully seized control of state troops and violated the state’s sovereign rights.

The case continues as part of a broader political and legal clash over the limits of presidential power to use the military for domestic law enforcement — a principle long resisted by both parties.

TAGGED:Donald TrumpOregonPortlandtrump
Share This Article
Facebook Threads Copy Link Print
ByVictor Sosu
Follow:
Victor Sosu is a dedicated digital storyteller with a sharp eye for detail and a passion for bringing facts to life. He covers entertainment, lifestyle, sports, and breaking news, bringing readers stories that are clear, timely, and grounded in real-world insight.
Previous Article Landan Jennings 39 9 Tennessee Killer Who Kept Victim’s Skull As ‘Souvenir’ To First Woman To Face Death Penalty in Two Centuries
Next Article 'Crying for his life': Mom and boyfriend beat 7-year-old boy to death in 'sick, demonic, ritual-like crime' Michigan Mom and Boyfriend Sentenced for ‘Sick, Demonic, Ritual-Like Crime’ That Killed 7-Year-Old Boy

You Might Also Like

trump rate 1
Politics

Trump Says His “Real” Approval Rating Is 64%, Dismissing Polls as Rigged

Dec. 31, 2025
donald trump winner 1200x685 1
News

Trump Says U.S. Struck South American Facility Linked to Drug Boats

Dec. 29, 2025
Foo Fighters Donate 'My Hero' Royalties to Kamala Harris After Trump's Unauthorized Use
Entertainment

Foo Fighters Donate ‘My Hero’ Royalties to Kamala Harris After Trump’s Unauthorized Use

Dec. 27, 2025
Trump threatens to Jail Mark Zuckerberg for life
Entertainment

Donald Trump threatens to Jail Mark Zuckerberg for life

Dec. 27, 2025
© 2026 Townflex.com. All Rights Reserved.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Sitemap
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?